As Destiny doesn’t come calling

How do you fact check a life?

Changed the title as it seems to sum it up all up!  This is my fourth  sixth version of this post.  Not sure that it’s better, but I keep on thinking about the subject.

Have very mixed feelings about Oprah. I had wanted her to apologize not to change how memoirs should be written. Loved her original definition: something about a persons truth at that time as perceived by the author.

Totally agree that big incidents should be fact checked? But how do you fact check a life?

Remember when Oprah first became known; her story was remarkable.  Of course, she’s a remarkable person.  But no person should have so much overt power.

Can she substantiate her claims that she was abused? Would it have been easier to substantiate when she was younger, more people were alive and memories were fresher?

Is she saying that she should be trusted because she’s famous and is Oprah, but different rules apply to the rest of us?

Realized that the only thing I could write a totally substantiated memoir on is the saga of my teeth–there would still be still be room for argument. And who would want to read it?  The torrid tale of a teeth bulimic: Actually the title sounds better than the story.

Who is Oprah to pronounce a moral judgement on another person? James Frey’s crimes were against the publishing world, other writers, not criminal. Oprah’s crimes are much larger as her words carry so much weight; way too much weight. Maybe it’s time Oprah relinquish her title as Queen of America.

 This is not to say that I agree with Frey in anyway.  Please; “several hours” is very different than “87 days” in jail! 

Finding out that wasn’t true made everything he said suspect.  But how the girl killed herself isn’t relevant.  She killed herself, that’s what is important.  But did she exist?  That too is important. 

What Frey was doing in those 87 days is very relevant.  Yet Oprah questioned the manner of death much more.  I was very disappointed.

I obsessively search about truth versus perceived truth. Truth is important to me, but memoirs are based on perceived truth as Oprah herself said.  Actually she said “your truth” or “the writers truth.”

For some many years I thought Mr. Grant said to Mary Richards on the first Mary Tyler Moore show “You’re perky.”  It was a really stupid mistake: he said “you’re spunky.”  Mary blushed and did a Mary thing 

Mr. Grant: “I hate spunk.”

My boss called me perky when I announced my resignation from SSA, and for some reason, the first Mary Tyler Moore show came to mind; and I have gotten it wrong ever since until Josh pointed it out; and then I cursed myself because the line would have sounded wrong with perky  That’s an honest unimportant mistake; the original intent is preserved.  But what did James Frey do during the 87 days? 

Really don’t care as I didn’t like the book when I first read it, and now care even less.

Being adopted and having been denied access to my birth records helped fuel that obsession; as did coming from a family where truth was valued above everything else.

I’m horrible at making composite characters; but isn’t that what you’re supposed to do for legal purposes?  And to protect privacy?  The only people I ever talk about are Lucia and Rafe, and I had them sign waivers.

I talk about my parents.  My sister and I grew up in the same house(s) with parents named who had the same names. But in our stories they are completely different people.  As my mother and her two sisters grew up with different mothers all named “Ceila.’.  That’s just the way it is; people remember their parents and childhood very differently.  Truth is perception; truth is subjective.

I was always known for having good judgement; now I find that I have always had a a condition that had to have colored my perceptions.  And yet other people remember the stories the same way but not in so much detail.  Maybe I had to paint a mental map of my life for myself in order to make sense of it.

 Oprah’s one hell of a powerful woman and if she says “based on a true story….” I would prefer the simple disclaimer “some incidents are fictionalized, and some of the characters are composite.”

But maybe that’s too much also because people will read the book wondering which incidents are true or not. Am confused; hope you’re not. Let me know what you think.

Let me add; truth is always subjective; Rashamon is perhaps the most famous film to delve into how different people see the same incident.  But that is limited to different interpretations of the same event.  The event happened; that is not open to doubt.

Decided that Oprah isn’t the brightest person on the planet; think she’s lost touch with the regular people of this world. There were so many things she could have focused on. Why the way the girl committed suicide?

Are we going to let Oprah dictate what we read? How we think? Gawd I’m getting angrier by the second

Said last week that I think I waited to write my memoir until I had friends in responsible positions in media. Of course one is a notorious practical joker, and the thought did cross my mind that he might find it funny to deny certain things though he’s basically not in the memoir for a zillion reasons that are nobodies business but mine

Saturday update: Lucia and Rafe came over last night.  We all laid down on my very comfortable double bed with gun metal posters and a head and foot board that exactly matches my living room radiator cover, and watched Oprah.  Lucia couldn’t take it; she knew the exact second I couldn’t take it anymore. 

When it became all about Oprah.  Damn she’s about the most powerful woman in America; and she talked about how embarrassed she was? 

No Oprah it doesn’t work that way;you mislead the public; but instead of apologizing to us, you acted as if it were all about you.

 Well it wasn’t.  It was about outright lies, deception, perception.  Frey was very very culpable; but Oprah really is America’s Goddess.  As such she is the is “the responsible adult.”

Think one of the biggest problems in our society is people not owning up to their mistakes.  In this case it’s both Oprah and Frey.

Should Nan Talese have insisted that the book be fact checked more?   Yes for such things as time served in jail; objective things that can be verified.

 But even there problems could happen.  Once interviewed somebody at a hotel restaurant; only my editor knew what I looked like;the fact checker said that it couldn’t be verified that I was there.  Actually it could have been easily, as the person that I was interviewing was well known to the restaurant and hotel staff.  I was the only woman talking to him; my name was with the maitre-de. 

Never had faith in the fact checker after that.  A fact checker is supposed to be able to ask questions.  People make fun of fact checkers; oh right they attribute Asperger like attributes to them.  No person who worked with me would think of me as a dowdy fact checker.  Quite the opposite; I was always one of the fun people.  I was perky and vivacious; I was fun.  Nobody knew I went home to a disordered life, and hated myself.  Did always think that my life would become easier as time went on.  I believed in myself and I don’t want to let that girl down now.

It angers me as if I wanted to do the “easy job” on my memoir; I could have sexed it up by making other peoples experiences mine; I could talk more about things that happened to other people.  While I played a big part in some of these stories I don’t own them;they’re not mine, and I’m not going to write things just to get published.  No, I don’t tell other peoples secrets even if I played a pivotal role in the story.

I agonize over making somethings that really did happen to me and sound unbelievable, more believable.  Somethings I just discard, though they really happened and helped shape the adult me, they’re too strange and I don’t know if I  could get people to verify these incidents as the people are no longer in my life.  And yes, I agonized over this long before the Oprah debacle. 

Would you want to pitch a memoir in this climate?  Should I give up on a dream because Oprah was embarrassed?  I know I should have written this years ago when I was young, my parents were alive, my records were still at NYU Medical Center.  But sometimes we have to defer a dream. 

Keep coming back to how embarrassed Oprah was.  If Oprah’s embarrassed, the publishing industry quivers; but maybe there will be a back lash.

Or the memoir genre will now belong to the already famous and to the very young.  Some people might say that’s natural; that the world does belong to the young and to the rich.

Won’t touch the Letterman/Oprah love fest; saw a promo, decided not to DVR it as I love Letterman and didn’t want to see him pandering to her.  I think the Countess; Lucia’s sister, who is an even bigger Letterman fan than I might have things to say about that. Know how disapointed she was in Oprah–read her comment on the Oprah site–blew me away.

 Anna of BIO and Pixel Forte has done an amazing job on giving Courting a fresh look; now I have to get the pages and other stuff together.  Will take awhile as I found bargain basement prices for a new desktop–19 inch LCD monitor for cheap, very cheap.  What  does that have to do with my putting old posts into categories and pages?  My eyes can’t wait for a 19 inch screen. 

My eyes need a break from the wonderful 14 inch laptop.  We love her; but she needs a long rest!

Am going to change categories and make pages so that all the “Zachary stories” are together; for one example.  So please bare with me as I slowly make Courting as user friendly as possible.

 

15!
  1. 1

    You seem to be on the right track dear Pia… Don’t have much to say… the damn in-laws got delayed again but I thought I might as well pop in and say hi!

    *Sigh*

    Reading you makes me feel better… if only I could move into your blog and not have to leave until it was safe here…

    Thank you for you and for Courting…

  2. 2

    I think you nailed it on Frey. I was listening to one of the three guys that run The Smoking Gun last night. He said that since they ‘exposed’ Frey, they have been overwhelmed with emails regarding every known author out there - all offering up information designed to ‘bring that author down’. The guy said they decided not to follow any of these up, or they would be in the business of ‘book de-bunking’.

    I find that horrendous. Does this mean no non-fiction book will be immune unless the author manages to check the weather report for a certain day in their past? ‘He said it was a grey, raining day, and we found out the forecast was for sun with no clouds. He lied! Off with his head!!!

    And like you - I do find Oprah culpable in all of this. Her endorsement is getting to be the kiss of death for some writers. I did a little blog surfing the other day, and found some conservative bloggers (and a few progressive ones) touting this incident and Oprah’s involvement as examples of the ‘intellectual elite’ gone bad; and how ‘they’ should be ‘dealt with’. That’s Bush talk - the, “get rid of all entertainment and art that we label as liberal” bunch.

    Where the hell does that leave the rest of us? Are the rules being changed mid-stream? Reagan-era politicos tried this - this attempt to define art in their own image. It didn’t work then. I am afraid it will now. The current crop of ‘regulators’ are much more proficient at defining what they consider correct, and shoving it down the rest of our throats.

    You seem to be feeling better, my dear. Hope your weekends a good one!

  3. Dawn Says:
    3

    Some of the best results come out of confused.

    It’s been my experience that in my case that it really isn’t confusion–more of my own fear of change, even chage for the better.

    I have faith in you Pia and your decisions.

    ***side note—getting closer to becoming an orchard/farm owner—I’ll keep you posted and when and where you could be munching on foodie stuff from my little farm. :) ***

  4. Sar Says:
    4

    Isn’t it convenient that Oprah (whom I’ve been a fan of) chose to address this as a staged confrontation on her show? Hmmm. Ratings perhaps?

    Looking forward to seeing Destiny revamped. So to speak. ;)

  5. Belle Says:
    5

    “how do you fact check a life?” thank-you for posting this because i had similar thoughts on my blog yesterday but i could have possibly saved all those words by summing it up with your question.

    side note~ i clicked on here via Miz B :)

  6. Teri Says:
    6

    You’re not confused. You’re spot on. To take one position, then back off because it is not the “popular” position makes one wonder what the big “O” really believes. So why bother. Hmmmm…I wonder what Ellen would say?

    Keep on keeping them honest Pia…

    Ciao chica…

  7. cooper Says:
    7

    Old Oprah is just a media whore.

    You are spot on, always.

    I’ll peak in to see how the housecleaning is going.

    Till then the streets of your city call to me.

  8. weirsdo Says:
    8

    In my usual obliviousness to pop culture, I haven’t followed this that closely, but it seems to me that if a writer claims to write fact and then lies about it he’s culpable. If she acknowleges various alterations she has made up front, however, I think there’s still room for faction.

  9. 9

    Pia my lady… it amazes me how you are able to add so much more oomf to an already oomfy post!

    Yeah… not too eloquent these days but I need to comment here.

    I read you and all I can think is, I love you lady!

    Hey, Belle dropped by! She is a very sweet, intelligent, talented (a ballerina I SAY!)friend I met here in the blogosphere. Glad you two have met!

    Hope the housecleaning is going well and that the mouth gives you no trouble this weekend!

    Much love…

    Miz B.

  10. 10

    The guy fooled Oprah and all the people who bought his book.

    The guy should call his next book “How I Fooled Oprah Winfrey”.

    One more thing.
    When did Oprah become the “Queen of America”?

  11. 11

    I found Oprah’s approach to be one of shame and blame and again counting on her “power” to chastise the offender. I think a lot of people came away from that show with a feeling of empathy for Frey and a recognition of the arrogance of Oprah. Take care.

  12. Debby Says:
    12

    Most of what I think has already been said. I will say, I have never read one of Oprah’s book picks. I feel that I am capable of picking out my own damn books. Based on what has occurred, I could never write a memoir, because I sure couldn’t fact check my own life, due to all the time I spent drunk and/or on drugs.

    Someone should tell Oprah that God called and he wants his job back!!

  13. cj Says:
    13

    I think I am going to read the book just so I can have read it. I have a friend who read it and said it had to BS before it came out that it was more fiction than nonfiction could ever be.

    Is it just me or is the worst thing in the world to be on “Oprah’s shit list?” *LOL* After all the hub-bub from the letterman show and now this… I wonder if that is the worst thing int he world to be on Oprah’s list.

  14. dan Says:
    14

    I think the issue with Frey is that he was made into some sort of hero for all the things he endured.

    And then when those things proved to be false, not only was the heroism taken away, but he lied to sell more books.

    That’s a pretty big deceit.

  15. 15

    The forever evolving post! I like it! I am met with a surprise everytime I check in!

    Letterman… I love the man… I love him… I hate Leno, love Letterman… that pretty much sums up my humor…

    Letterman made me laugh during some of the darkest moments of my life, when there was no laughter in life itself. I was 19 back then and the only dates I was interested in were my late night rendezvous with Letterman… I wish I could see him here in Spain!

    As for Oprah, you go girl! You are absolutely right!